Finance, Forex and Investments

Population exchange and Racism?

England has historically been pro-immigration, which is why so many millions left for India, Australia, Hong Kong, USA etc. There are approx 60 million Brits on the other continents. Why is it that there has been so much hostility towards immigrants to the UK, e.g say the 1.5 million Indians living in the UK , when most British people didnt have a problem settling down in India? About 90% of Australia is White, predominantly British, and most are 1st , 2nd or 3rd generation and came during the "White Policy era" which ended in Australia in 1975. How can people morally justify being against immigration to Europe, when there are only 15 million from other continents living in Europe??? There is ½ billion Europeans on the other continents. 93% of Argentina is White, 85% of Canada and so on , so how about a POPULATION EXCHANGE to satisfy BNP supporters? Then the 15 million people from other continents who came to Europe in the 20th century can return home and the 500 million from Europe on the other continents who arrived on those continents in the 20th century can return home? Alternatively , racist attacks on Indians in UK/Australia and such countries can come to an end , and they can accept they exploited India for 200 years and took Indian tax payers money and now repay few of them back via charity - and we can all be happy that there are Whites on the other continents , and Blacks in Europe - which is GLOBAL HARMONY and UNITY IN DIVERSITY

Public Comments

1. We have the same thing here in Ireland. We all emigrated to America and mainland Europe for years (mainly when there was famine) yet we still complain about immigrants (mainly Polish and Nigerians). Personally, I think every country should respect immigrants if they want to be respected in other countries themselves
2. The UK is too small to sustain a heavy and ever increasing population, it is bound to cause social problems, but try mentioning that and you get called a racist, too much "diversity" becomes a social burden EDIT@Tom talks about 'ethnic cleansing' he obviously doesnt have much of a clue what that means,does he really believe that "people from australia" are coming here at the rate that middle eastern people are arriving here? no i dont think so.The labour party are guilty of pre planned "ethnic cleansing" of the indigenous peoples of ths island by opening the floodgates and letting in millions of people from non white countries and allowing them to outbreed the native families and bully them into accepting this by calling them racist if they object. EDIT@tom - bringing in black or asians into the country isnt eliminating white people? oh really, importing millions of them is going to have somewhat of an alteration on the demographical scale isnt it dont you think?, you just look round the schools and hospitals in our towns and cities and look how many of them are from non-indigenous/foreign stock, its an invasion from within, and we certainly werent asked if millions of people from the 3rd world could occupy our land and take up/use/destroy our resources, so why dont you look up ther united nations defenition of genocide and we'll compare notes and see who's the closest? EDIT - whites are not being removed..not by force no, but eventually as you've just admitted they will become a displaced and despised minority here in their own country, you sound as if you're ok with that then? The UK cannot continue to "expand in size" we dont have the room for it, why the hell should we be taking in anyone?im sorry if its harsh but the majority of people that have come here in the the past 10-12 years are freeloaders, and have no other purpose other than to divide us and get us fighting amongst ourselves, we did not ask for them and the best thing that could be done is to send them back with a friendly 'we are full' or at least close the borders. There are plenty of people on this island already and by the time they've finished reproducing, where are we going to put them all? can they come and live with you tom? im sure you've got plenty of space and dont mind keeping them, because if you dont then il call you a racist.Ijust wish i could go back in time and tell our grandfathers not to bother as we will be invaded by people who will wipe us out anyway.
3. Very well put.
4. Indeed, anyone who thinks that there's no such thing as a white African or a black European is stupid.
5. You don't sound like a bored guy to me, you sound like a guy with an ax to grind,,, preferably into a white persons head, am I right.
6. There is a huge difference between a conqueror and some freeloading immigrant.
7. Sod says Britian is too small to sustain immigration. But the BNP sees no problem in white people from places like Australia coming over here and expanding the size of the country, as when Pauline Hanson said she wanted to come the BNP opened their arms. What the BNP mean is that Britian is too small for white people to walk along the streets and not see black people every so often, or something like that. The BNP complain about anything. They complained that 1 in 8 people in the UK were foreign born and that this was such a problem, yet the majority of these people are white christians, the largest foreign population is Irish, the BNP want to "invite" Ireland to join the Union (mainly to get Ulster Unionist votes) so that these foreign born would then not be, but the BNP still uses the statistics without thinking. The BNP even have policies that want to kick out "immigrants" from the UK. What they mean are "ethno-immigrants" or blacks and asians to most people. They have so many excuses like "Britian is too full" and try and act like they are respectable, but the reality is they are just looking at ethnically cleansing the UK. Immigration needs to be dealt with better. The BNP claim to be the only party that have something good to say on the matter, but the reality is the BNP do not have any sensible solutions for this, or just about any other issue out there. You cannot solve problems by dstroying the fabric of society! Edit: Sod. Yes, the good old BNP trick of trying to put on others what should be put on the BNP. But why don't we look at the term "ethnic cleansing" and see who is right. http://education.yahoo.com/reference/dictionary/entry/ethnic%20cleansing "The systematic elimination of an ethnic group or groups from a region or society, as by deportation, forced emigration, or genocide." The elimination of an ethnic group. Now, bringing in asians or blacks into the UK is not eliminating white people, is it? The white people are not being killed, deported, forced to emigrate or having genocide committed against them. But the BNP's policy of kicking blacks and asians out of the UK is the elimination of an ethnic group by deportation or forced emigration. "The official United Nations definition of ethnic cleansing is "rendering an area ethnically homogeneous by using force or intimidation to remove from a given area persons of another ethnic or religious group."" Sounds like what the BNP are doing. Perhaps you can enlighten everyone as to how the white people in the UK are being deported, forced to emigrate or any other manner of ethnic cleansing!!! http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/ethnic+cleansing Or perhaps this. "the expulsion, imprisonment, or killing of an ethnic minority by a dominant majority in order to achieve ethnic homogeneity " The dominant majority would be, er, the white people. They BNP are seeing homogeneity, and for those BNPers not in the know this has nothing to do with homosexuals. This definition also sounds like the BNP's list of policies in their manifestos! Edit: Sod Yes, it is going to change the demographics of the country, but that is not what ethnic cleansing is. Read it again. Ethnic cleansing is not the reduction in percentage of the majority population, ethnic cleansing is the deliberate REMOVAL of an ethnic group. White people ARE NOT being removed, the UK is EXPANDING in size, which means, there are white people and black people and asian people. Go read up on the genocides in Rwanda and see the difference.
8. Even if the BNP took power, such a population exchange would be wrong. You would be forcing people in other nations to 'return' to the UK and that would be a violation of their human rights.